|
21/05/2010 18:38:10
|
janiko
Posts 107
Go to Holik' profile
|
Hi all...
Both cameras are great but who can tell me the defaults and the bad sides of them ? I mean, no need to tell me why they are great cameras, I just want to know if there's any point that can help me to choose btw them. Any comment welcome !
- Janiko
--
Sauf erreur de ma part, je ne me trompe jamais.
|
|
22/05/2010 00:14:22
|
prezntime
Posts 99
Go to Holik' profile
|
Wish I could help with this, but alas...it's not to be. Although, I'm sure when Francis gets ahold of this thread he will
have alot to say.
I say go large format, 8x10 maybe... 
|
|
22/05/2010 13:25:41
|
janiko
Posts 107
Go to Holik' profile
|
Well, I already have some... Something like that, a 60x90. But it's not a numeric one 
--
Sauf erreur de ma part, je ne me trompe jamais.
|
|
22/05/2010 18:01:24
|
Luko
Posts 137
Go to Holik' profile
|
Jean that's quite easy.
If full format matters to you, take the 5Dmk2, if it is only a marginal concern get the 7D which has EVERYTHING (AF, shutter, awesome remote flash management, ability to take both EF and EFS lenses).
At first I was skeptical on why Canon launched the 7D, now I can see why. This weapon is a Nikon D300 killer, hence the red brand engineers put some real value in it.
|
|
23/05/2010 13:09:36
|
janiko
Posts 107
Go to Holik' profile
|
Well... That's exactly the point : does full frame matters for me ? What to prefer : a full frame or an APS-C with (in some aspects) better performances ? Because I never tried full frame, I'm a bit confused till now.
But I have time to think, fortunately. Thanks again.
--
Sauf erreur de ma part, je ne me trompe jamais.
|
|
24/05/2010 10:07:01
|
Luko
Posts 137
Go to Holik' profile
|
janiko wrote:
Well... That's exactly the point : does full frame matters for me ?
See... You've replied to the question by yourself : if you ask yourself whether something matters, it means you don't really need it, especially if you never tried it.
Get the 7D, 1.000€ less expensive. 
|
|
pages:
1 |
|---|